| By Date: | <-- --> |
| By Thread: | <-- --> |
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 02:36 +0100, Udo Rader wrote: > On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 20:06 -0500, Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > > At 06:27 PM 1/31/2006, Udo Rader wrote: > > >1) can this flag be set with itext or > > > > No. > > > > > > >2) is there an alternative to reach my requirements? > > > > No. > > > > Adobe LiveCycle Reader Extensions Server is the only option. > > twice a no can't be good ... > > However, what is the technical reason for this? I mean, setting a flag > sounds trivial to me, or is the entire resulting PDF produced in a > completely different way then? To answer my own question, this is worse than I expected. Obviously the extended flags are signed with the certificate of the "Adobe Reader-Extension Root CA", as stated on page 228 of the JS reference. So it would be technically easy, yet becomes impossible due to the use of certificates ... obviously money rules the world :-) Udo Rader -- BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH http://www.bestsolution.at
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part