Mailers and records MX

[Charles Lacroix <clacroix (at) cegep-ste-foy.qc.ca>]

Postfix website is outa date, with the new method that mailscanner uses it's 
alot safer.

and this has absolutely nothing to do with mailservers talking to the wrong 
MX :)



On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:49, Simon J Mudd wrote:
> israel.garcia (at) cimex.com.cu writes:
> >  even more details:
> >
> > 1. I use Mailscanner/postfix in the 3 MX's servers.
> > 2. Using dig I get exactly the same of what I have in my bind server.
> > 3.  http://dnsreport.com/ reports no problem at all.
> > 4. I'm not using any greylisting.... Yet.. I'm setting right now
> > spamassassin with mailscanner..
>
> See http://www.postfix.org/addon.html
>
> Quoting from the page:
>
> --- quote ---
> mailscanner system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. This uses
> unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files, and there are
> multiple reports of message duplication and/or delivery of truncated
> messages.
> --- quote ---
>
> It's use is NOT recommended by Postfix's author.  This may not be
> the cause of the problem but ...
>
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS (at) centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS (at) centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos